Biodiversity Challenge 2: Species

UKGF ancient tree

veteran tree with priority lichen species (c) Miles King

Continuing on my theme for this week, which is about Biodiversity Challenge 20 years on, today I’m looking at what BC did for species conservation in Britain.

As I said yesterday, before Biodiversity Challenge and the BAP, species conservation in Britain focussed on Birds, a few mammals only the most charismatic of other species. And the approach was very, very site-based. Conservation priority was based primarily on absolute rarity – how many 10km squares a species occurred in; and how pretty it was.

I worked at BBONT (now BBOWT) before I went to Plantlife and was lucky enough to have 2 military orchid sites and a Red Helleborine site under my responsibility. These very rare orchids got a great deal of attention – indeed orchid wardens would spend the summer in rickety old caravans on site, to stop orchid thieves stealing them. Actually there werent really any orchid thieves, but there were hundreds of photographers some of whom werent too fussed about the damage they caused, to get the best photo. So the wardens were visitor managers really.

Meanwhile other species that were rapidly disappearing from England – Blysmus compressus the Flat Sedge, or Carex vulpina the True Fox sedge, were paid little or no attention.

Biodiversity Challenge changed all that, by introducing the 4 criteria for conservation priority-setting – global threat, international importance, rate of decline and absolute rarity.

This was fantastic for the neglected taxa non butterfly inverts, lower plants and fungi. But it did present us with a problem – we didnt have the data to show for example decline rates. However I was extremely lucky at Plantlife to have Plantlife Link which brought together experts from the Learned plant Societies (British Bryological Society, British Lichen Society, British Mycological Society, the British Pteridological Society and the British Phycological Society – if I have missed anyone out I apologise – it was a long time ago). They provided expert opinion on which species met each criteria.

Pulling together data and expert opinion we compiled the short list of priority species, the middle list and the long list. There were many arguments about which species should be on which list, but we tried to be as objective as possible, and added weight to global threat and rate of decline. Thanks to increased funding for species conservation, from English Nature, CCW and SNH plus other sources, the NGOs started to broaden their approach to species conservation. Butterfly Conservation were particularly good at raising funds to widen their species work. I think the success of BC also spurred others into action to create new organisations – Buglife for instance, founded by Alan Stubbs who played such a key role in the early days of Biodiversity Challenge.

The priority list was originally I think about 300 species. Each species had a Species Action Plan produced for it and these were implemented, to a greater or lesser degree, depending on funds.

After I left Plantlife I worked on implementing SAPs for Shore Dock and Juniper, both priority species. For shore dock it was relatively straightforward, a case of doing more survey, finding more locations and getting them protected. As a habitats directive listed species this was quite easy, although we still failed to stop one site being partly destroyed by a hotel insisting on a soft cliff being rock-armoured to prevent erosion (that was probably being caused by run-off from the cliff top tennis court). For juniper, the opposite was true. There were so many intractable problems with conserving juniper in England and it was going down the pan so fast, it was like a slow motion car crash. Juniper expert Lena Ward and I re-surveyed Juniper in Sussex – it was my only  published scientific paper. The decline was staggering and no matter how effective a SAP for Juniper was, it wasn’t going to stop that decline.

Once the ground had been prepared by Challenge, the official BAP process came up with “Lead Partners” “Contact Points” and “Champions”. The Lead Partners were statutory agencies, contact points NGOs and Champions were sponsors. I have to say from my perspective this never really worked. NGOs who did most of the hard work resented being called contact points, while some Lead Partners were anything but, and only the most charismatic species gained Champions. Plus ca change. Having said that Scottish Link have done a very successful mini campaign getting MSPs to sign up to be species champions for priority species in Scotland. This is clever, as it draws in political engagement and even a sense of ownership, which is totally essential for any conservation activity.  Even now the Splendid Waxcap has so far no MSP champion – fungi are as ever at the bottom of the priority list, despite being probably the most important group from an ecosystem perspective.

Now, 20 years on, we have a legally constituted Section 41 (or S42) list of species of principal importance – with over a thousand species on it. This list is by no means perfect. Invertebrate experts have pointed out to me that there could easily be five times as many inverts on the list as there currently are, based on threat and decline. Indeed it came as news to me that some of the inverts are there to represent a whole group of species; something that has not really worked. The failure to create a meaningful biodiversity duty as a tool to implement action for priority species has also mitigated the value of the list. I actually think the S41/42 lists are too long now, as the task is now so insurmountable as to be demoralising. The original short list of 300 or so I think would have been the right sort of size to aim for, for political reasons.

Nevertheless I think it is true to say that BC changed the face of species conservation in the UK.

Advertisements

About Miles King

UK conservation professional, writing about nature, politics, life. All views are my own and not my employers. I don't write on behalf of anybody else.
This entry was posted in Action Plans, biodiversity, biodiversity challenge and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Biodiversity Challenge 2: Species

  1. Mark Fisher says:

    “41 Biodiversity lists and action (England)
    (1)The Secretary of State must, as respects England, publish a list of the living organisms and types of habitat which in the Secretary of State’s opinion are of principal importance for the purpose of conserving biodiversity.
    (2) Before publishing any list the Secretary of State must consult Natural England as to the living organisms or types of habitat to be included in the list.
    (3) Without prejudice to section 40(1) and (2), the Secretary of State must—
    (a) take such steps as appear to the Secretary of State to be reasonably practicable to further the conservation of the living organisms and types of habitat included in any list published under this section, or
    (b) promote the taking by others of such steps.
    (4) The Secretary of State must, in consultation with Natural England—
    (a) keep under review any list published under this section,
    (b) make such revisions of any such list as appear to the Secretary of State appropriate, and
    (c) publish any list so revised as soon as is reasonably practicable after revising it”

    “we have a legally constituted Section 41 (or S42) list of species of principal importance”

    “In England many of our rarest and most threatened species are listed under Section 41 (S41) of the 2006 Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act”

    “PLEASE NOTE – the actions highlighted represent the considered view of species experts from a range of organisations. They do not replace or necessarily reflect any existing Government policy nor that of its agencies”

    As you can see above, there is NOT a list of species listed under Section 41 of the NERC Act. In a re-run of Biodiversity Challenge, the list drawn as a requirement of the Act had the bootprints of the conservation industry all over it. No one asked me! So what we have is a conservation industry picking and choosing their favourite species (and habitats) and hiding behind s41. Actually, lets see the full extent of this nonsense, when Brighton and Hove Council can list the Convention on Biological Diversity, the UK Biodiversity Action Plan and the BAP for calcareous grassland therein, and Section 40 of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 as an obligation on the council to have regard to biodiversity in the exercise of its functions, none of which forced them to illegally fell 229 licencable oak trees, throw up fencing and push on sheep – all ostensibly to re-instate calcareous grassland for a few butterflies and, of course, funded by Higher Level Stewardship. The Council could, of course, have recognized that oak trees of up to 80 years of age were not the scrub that they repeatedly described it as and, instead, recognized the natural tree regeneration as being a contribution to the BAP on deciduous woodland, along with the uncommon fungi and bird population that it supported. As Clive Hambler may have put it, “what choice would aliens have made?”

    • Miles King says:

      Thanks Mark.

      I hope you aren’t expecting me to leap to the defence of Brighton’s actions.

      Defra and Natural England reviewed the S41 list for England in 2010. I fully expect them to have another look at it after the current Quinquennial Review process is over. I’ll make sure I send you the link so you can submit a response.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s